************************************************************
27.  Characterization of particles, ammonia and endotoxin in
swine confinement operations.
Pickrell, J. A.; Heber, A. J.; Murphy, J. P.; Henry, S. C.; May,
M. M.; Nolan, D.; Oehme, F. W.; Gillespie, J. R.; Schoneweis, D. 

Vet-hum-toxicol v.35, p.421-428. (1993).
Includes references.
Descriptor: pig-housing; intensive-farming; intensive-husbandry;
dust-; pig-manure; ammonia-; endotoxins-; particle-size;
spatial-variation; ventilation-; spring-; summer-; winter-
NAL Call No.: SF601.A47
************************************************************
28.  Chemical composition of cyanobacteria grown in diluted,
aerated swine wastewater.
Canizares Villanueva, R. O.; Dominguez, A. R.; Cruz, M. S.; Rios
Leal, E. 

Bioresour-technol v.51, p.111-116. (1995).
Includes references.
Descriptor: phormidium-; spirulina-; cell-culture; waste-water;
pig-manure; waste-water-treatment; biological-treatment;
aerobic-treatment; algal- protein; biomass-;
chemical-composition; spirulina-maxima
Abstract: The chemical composition of Spirulina maxima and
Phormidium sp. biomasses grown on pretreated and diluted swine
wastewater was  determined Analyses were carried out on
lyophilized samples and compared with data from mineral media
(controls). Analyses of Phormidium  grown on aeration-stabilized
wastewater (ASSW) were: protein (Nx 625) 62%, lipids 11%,
carbohydrates (calculated by difference) 16%. For  Spirulina in
the same effluent, data were: protein 36%, lipids 6% and
carbohydrates 44%. No crude fiber was found in any of the
samples. The  fatty acid profiles of both biomasses showed
important differences when compared to controls. The biomasses
contained all the essential amino  acids. The Spirulina biomass
had a significantly higher content of pyridoxine, riboflavin and
pantothenic and nicotinic acids than Phormidium  when grown on
ASSW, but in general the vitamin content of both biomasses was
practically the same as their respective controls. The results 
suggest that Phormidium and Spirulina biomasses could be used as
dietary supplements in animal feed, but further studies are
needed to  determine the nutritional value of the product.
NAL Call No.: TD930.A32
************************************************************
29.  Chemical treatment of swine wastewater.
Gao, Y. C.; Liao, P. H.; Lo, K. V. 

J-Environ-Sci-Health-Part-A-Environ-Sci-Eng v.A28, p.795-807.
(1993).
Includes references.
Descriptor: pig-manure; pig-slurry; waste-water-treatment;
chemical-treatment; chemicals-; biochemical-oxygen-demand;
chemical-oxygen-demand; phosphates-; dosage-; british-columbia;
suspended-solids; total-solids
NAL Call No.: TD172.J6
************************************************************
30.  Chronic copper poisoning in sheep grazing pastures
fertilized with swine manure.
Kerr, L. A.; McGavin, H. D. 

J-Am-Vet-Med-Assoc v.198, p.99-101. (1991).
Includes references.
Descriptor: ewes-; copper-; poisoning-; pig-manure; fertilizers-;
grazing-; molybdenum-; symptoms-; histopathology-; mortality-;
pregnancy-; case- reports
NAL Call No.: 41.8-Am3
************************************************************
31.  A combined anaerobic--aerobic process for the co-treatment
of effluents from a piggery and a cheese factory.
Montuelle, B.; Coillard, J.; Le Hy, J. B. 

J-Agric-Eng-Res v.51, p.91-100. (1992).
Includes references.
Descriptor: piggery-effluent; cheesemaking-; effluents-;
anaerobic-treatment; aerobic-treatment; biogas-; production-;
france-
Abstract: Food processing industries can cause serious
environmental problems. In particular, piggeries and milk/cheese
factories need improved  treatment of their wastewater,
especially if land-spreading of wastes is not possible, limited
or forbidden. This paper reports on a study of a  treatment plant
whose originality lies in the combination of two treatment
stages, the first anaerobic, the second aerobic. The technical
problems  encountered during the installation of the digester and
the optimization of the working of the whole treatment plant
during 2 years are analysed  and discussed. Besides a daily
monitoring of the anaerobic stage, complete measurements were
carried out on the treatment process in order to  control the
steady state performance of the plant. The biogas produced is
used in a cheese factory and allows propane consumption to be 
reduced by 26%. The anaerobic digestion of the slurry, followed
by a settling process, leads to changes in the nature of the
effluent entering the  aerobic stage. In particular, the C/N
ratio would be unfavourable for the denitrification process,
without the cheese factory washing-water,  which brings the
necessary organic carbon. The reduction in organic load achieved
by the digester (94% reduction of BOD and 74% of soluble  COD)
allows sufficient concentrations to maintain a good aerobic
oxidation and a good nitrification process in the oxidation
ditch. Overall the  whole treatment process achieves 98% COD
reduction, more than 99% BOD reduction and 93% N reduction.
NAL Call No.: 58.8-J82
************************************************************
32.  Combining swine housing units into a system of buildings.
Muehling, A. J.; Collins, E. R. Jr.; Mohling, S.; Mohling, K. 

Pork industry handbook. West Lafayette, Ind. : Cooperative
Extension Service, Purdue University, [1978?-1990].. 4 p. 
In the subseries: Housing. (PIH-22), revised December 1991.
Descriptor: pigs-; pig-housing; site-selection; drainage-;
pig-manure; farrowing-houses; fire-prevention;
building-construction; landscaping-; usa-
NAL Call No.: SF395.P62
************************************************************
33.  A comparison of models for predicting slurry production on a
pig farm.
Williams, A. G.; Streader, W. V. 

Biol-Wastes v.31, p.187-197. (1990).
Includes references.
Descriptor: pig-farming; pig-slurry; production-; prediction-;
models-
NAL Call No.: TD930.A32
************************************************************
34.  A comparison of runoff quality effects of organic and
inorganic fertilizers applied to fescuegrass plots.
Edwards, D. R.; Daniel, T. C. 

Water-resour-bull v.30, p.35-41. (1994).
Includes references.
Descriptor: poultry-manure; pig-manure; npk-fertilizers; runoff-;
water-quality; festuca-arundinacea; pastures-; pollution-;
arkansas-; nonpoint-source-pollution
Abstract: Application of fertilizer can degrade quality of
runoff, particularly during the first post-application,
runoff-producing storm. This  experiment assessed and compared
runoff quality impacts of organic and inorganic fertilizer
application for a single simulated storm occurring  seven days
following application. The organic fertilizers used were poultry
(Gallus gallus domesticus) litter, poultry manure, and swine (Sus 
scrofa domesticus) manure. All fertilizers were applied at an
application rate of 217.6 kg N/ha. Simulated rainfall was applied
at 50 mm/h for an  average duration of 0.8 h. Runoff samples were
collected, composited, and analyzed for nitrate N (NO3-N),
ammonia N (NH3-N), total  Kjeldahl N (TKN), ortho-P (PO4-P),
total P (TP), chemical oxygen demand (COD), total suspended
solids (TSS), fecal coliforms (FC), and  fecal streptococci (FS).
Application of the fertilizers did not alter the hydrologic
characteristics of the receiving plots relative to the control 
plots. Concentrations of fertilizer constituents were almost
always greater from treated than from control plots and were
usually much greater.  Flow-weighted mean concentrations of
NH3-N, PO4-P, and TP were highest for the inorganic fertilizer
treatment (42.0, 26.6, and 27.9 mg/L  respectively). Runoff COD
and TSS concentrations were greatest for the poultry litter
treatment. Concentrations of FC and FS were greater for 
fertilized than for control plots with no differences among
fertilized plots, but FC concentrations for all treatments were
in excess of Arkansas'  primary and secondary contact standards.
Mass losses of fertilizer constituents were low (< 3 kg/ha) and
were small proportions (< 3.
NAL Call No.: 292.9-Am34
************************************************************
35.  Comparisons of biological and chemical methods to predict
nitrogen mineralization in animal wastes.
Serna, M. D.; Pomares, F. 

Biol-Fertil-Soils v.12, p.89-94. (1991).
Includes references.
Descriptor: zea-mays; pig-manure; poultry-manure; nitrogen-;
mineralization-; nutrient-availability; nutrient-uptake;
prediction-; waste-disposal; spain-
NAL Call No.: QH84.8.B46
************************************************************
36.  Composition and digestibility of untreated and chemically
treated animal excreta for ruminants: a review.
Flachowsky, G.; Hennig, A. 

Biol-Wastes v.31, p.17-36. (1990).
Includes references.
Descriptor: pig-slurry; poultry-manure; cattle-dung;
chemical-treatment; feeds-; production-; sheep-feeding;
nutrient-content; mineral-content; digestibility-; reviews-;
waste-utilization
NAL Call No.: TD930.A32
************************************************************


monday tuesday wednesday thursday friday saturday sunday partyday funday niceday 53A2.2583 53A4.2584 53A5.2585 53A6.2586 53A6.2587 53A8.2588 53A9.2589 53A9.259A 53AA.258A 5412.2692 5413.2693 5414.2694 5415.2695 5415.2696 5417.2697 5418.2698 5419.2699 5421.27A1 5422.27A2 5422.27A3 5424.27A3 5424.27A5 5424.27A6 5427.27A7 5428.27A8 5429.271A 5429.27A9 542A.27AA 5431.2711 5431.2712 5433.2713 5434.2714 5434.2715 5436.2715 5437.2717 5438.2718 5439.2719 5441.2721 5441.2722 5443.2723 5444.2724 5444.2725 5446.2726 5446.2727 5448.2728 5449.2729 5449.273A 544A.272A 5451.2731 5452.2731 5453.2733 5454.2733 5454.2735 5456.2736 5456.2737 5456.2738 5459.2739 5461.2741 5462.2742 5463.2743 5463.2744 5465.2745 5465.2746 5467.2747 5467.2748 5469.2749 546A.274A 5471.2751 5471.2752 5473.2753 5474.2753 5475.2755 5476.2756 5476.2757 5478.2758 5479.2759 547A.275A 5482.2762 5483.2762 5483.2764 5485.2765 5485.2766 5485.2767 5488.2767 5489.2769 5489.277A 548A.2761 548A.276A 5491.2771 5492.2772 5493.2773 5494.2774 5495.2775 5496.2776 5497.2777 5498.2778 5499.2779 54A1.2681 54A1.2682 54A1.2683 54A4.2684 54A5.2685 54A6.2686 54A6.2687 54A8.2688 54A8.2689 54A8.2691 54AA.268A 5512.2792 5512.2793 5514.2794 5514.2795 5516.2796 5517.2797 5517.2798 5519.2799 5522.28A2 5523.28A3 5524.28A4 5524.28A5 5524.28A6 5527.28A7 5527.28A8 5529.2811 5529.281A 5529.28A9 552A.28A1 552A.28AA 5532.2812 5532.2813 5534.2814 5535.2815 5536.2816 5536.2817 5538.2818 5539.2819 5542.2822 5542.2823 5544.2824 5545.2825 5546.2826 5546.2827 5548.2828 5549.2829 5549.283A 554A.2821 554A.282A 5551.2831 5552.2832 5552.2833 5554.2833 5555.2835 5555.2836 5557.2837 5557.2838 5559.2838 5559.284A 5561.2841 5562.2842 5563.2842 5563.2844 5563.2845 5566.2846 5567.2847 5568.2848 5568.2849 5571.2851 5571.2852 5573.2853 5574.2854 5575.2855 5575.2856 5575.2857 5578.2858 5579.2858 557A.285A 5581.2861 5582.2862 5582.2863 5584.2864 5585.2865 5586.2866 5586.2867 5586.2868 5589.2869 558A.286A 5591.2871 5592.2872 5593.2873 5594.2874 5595.2875 5596.2875 5597.2877 5598.2878 5598.2879 559A.287A 55A1.2781 55A1.2782 55A1.2783 55A4.2784 55A5.2785 55A6.2786 55A7.2787 55A8.2788 55A9.2788 55A9.2791 55A9.279A 55AA.278A 5611.2891 5612.2892 5613.2893 5613.2894 5613.2895 5616.2896 5617.2897 5621.29A1 5622.29A2 5623.29A3 5624.29A4 5624.29A5 5624.29A6 5627.29A7 5628.29A8 5628.29A9 562A.29AA 5631.2911 5632.2912 5632.2913 5634.2914 5635.2915 5635.2916 5637.2917 5637.2918 5639.2918 5639.2921 5639.292A 563A.291A 5642.2922 5643.2923 5643.2924 5645.2925 5646.2926 5646.2927 5648.2928 5649.2929 5652.2932 5652.2933 5654.2934 5654.2935 5654.2936 5654.2937 5658.2938 5659.2939 565A.2931 565A.293A 5661.2941 5662.2941 5663.2943 5664.2944 5665.2945 5666.2946 5666.2947 5666.2948 5669.2949 5669.295A 5671.2951 5672.2952 5673.2953 5674.2954 5675.2955 5676.2956 5677.2957 5678.2958 5678.2959 5681.2961 5682.2962 5683.2963 5684.2964 5685.2965 5685.2966 5687.2967 5688.2968 5689.2969 5689.2971 568A.296A 5692.2972 5693.2973 5693.2974 5695.2975 5696.2976 5697.2977 5698.2978 5699.2979 56A1.2881